Michael Hart’s the RISE and FALL of the UNITED STATES An Indispensable History For The Historic American Nation


If you want to know American history, the main place you need to avoid is the college campus. As Heather Mac Donald recently declared on FoxNews, colleges are now “hatred machines” that systematically teach tomorrow’s elite to despise this country and the people who created it [Heather Mac Donald: American Colleges Today Are “Hatred Machines” by Tim Hains, RealClearPolitics, August 14, 2018]. Yet Dr. Michael Hart, author of Restoring America, has a partial solution with his new book The Rise And Fall Of The United States Of America, a rational, enlightening, and penetrating history of this country. For homeschoolers, lifelong learners, or students who aren’t getting a real education from their overpaid professors, this book is a must read.

Dr. Hart’s book is invaluable because it highlights some of the basic truths about America that modern-day histories simply conceal. For example, he writes: “America is much younger than most European nations. It did not exist at all prior to 1600 AD but was created in the ‘colonial era.’”

This alone is a shot across the bow of Politically Correct histories that regard “America” simply as a geographic location. As Dr. Hart knows, “America” did not exist in any meaningful sense before the English settlement that created it—our eponymous Virginia Dare’s Roanoke Colony being the prototype. English settlers didn’t “invade” a country that belonged to “Native Americans,” English settlers created one where none existed.

Dr. Hart provides a basic history of America’s development, including highlighting specific incidents that ultimately proved critical to the future of the polity. One of the more interesting was the Zenger trial, a colonial case in which a journalistcriticized the local governor and was charged with libel. A grand jury refused to indict Zenger, accepting his defense that the things he printed were true. Thanks to this case, Americans can claim truth as an absolute defense in libel cases, something our British cousins lack.

A highlight of Dr. Hart’s history is his careful attention to demographic issues. For example, he scoffs at the claim sometimes heard within the dimmer quarters of the American Conservative Movement that the Constitution was a “miracle.” Instead, Dr. Hart shows that the authors of America’s governing document shared linguistic, cultural, racial, and experiential factors that allowed them to work together. (Contemporary American statesmen possess no such unanimity.) Dr. Hart is also not blind to the Constitution’s faults, especially its failure to designate how and who has the power to interpret it—specifically, not necessarily the Kritarchs on the Supreme Court.

Dr. Hart is also clearsighted regarding immigration. He does not accept the now de rigueur analysis that immigration from widely disparate regions was always a feature of American life. “Before 1849, immigrants to the Untied States came mostly from the Protestant regions of northwest Europe, including Holland, Sweden, NorwayGermany and Great Britain,” he observes. He also provides an honest assessment of the difficulties Irish immigration presented for 19th century America and argues that despite speaking English, “they assimilated very slowly.”

Dr. Hart argues the “Golden Age” of the United States extended from 1865 to 1991. “During that interval the United States stood out for its wealth, for its military might, and for its unprecedented set of practical inventions and scientific discoveries,” he argues. Indeed, one of the best parts of the book is when Dr. Hart recounts the numerous inventions and scientific advances America has given to the world.

However, Dr. Hart’s most invaluable contribution is in detailing what he sees as the symptoms of America’s decline after the Cold War. America’s indebtedness, relatively poor military performance, loss of Constitutional liberties, and collapse of artistic standards are all covered. Two other issues highly relevant to immigration patriots are what Dr. Hart calls “political problems” and “loss of confidence and national pride.”

Dr. Hart details how Democratic politicians have diligently opposed any efforts to implement common-sense voter ID laws to prevent election fraud. Media bias is another major political problem, one an increasing number of Americans are awakening to. Finally, Dr. Hart identifies the “increase in racial hostilities” as both a symptom and a cause of America’s increasing political problems. “Black hostility towards whites is constantly being stirred up by ‘race hustlers’ such as Al Sharpton, who deny any good faith on the part of whites,” he writes. “Many people deny that any progress has been made in the status and treatment of black Americans—a blatant untruth which increases black suspicions and hostilities.”

Similarly, the decline in national pride is partially a product of how the charge of “racism” has delegitimized our entire national history. “According to many of these critics, our Constitution was produced by a group of ‘Dead White European Males’ (DWEMs, for short) who do not deserve any respect,” he writes. As a result of internalizing this poisonous attack on America’s heritage, some advocate Open Borders as a kind of historical reparations of punishment for a “racist” country.

Dr. Hart writes:

One result of these attitudes is that many Americans find it unreasonable for the United States to defend its borders. (After all, since we stole the country from the Indians, we have no real claim on our land.) Sometimes these views lead to people suggesting that non-citizens should be permitted to vote in American elections. In any disagreement or conflict between the United States and a foreign group, many of these critics tend to blame America first. Many of these critics do not even pretend to be patriotic.

Dr. Hart identifies a host of causes to explain the emergence of these symptoms. Though they are too many to cover here, two very much worth mentioning are

  • racial antagonisms
  • immigration

Dr. Hart points out that for all the talk about white racism, the vast majority of interracial crime is committed by blacks against whites. Hatred of whites is not only mainstream but cultivated by the Main Stream Media, the education system, and even some Democratic politicians—a coalition that Dr. Hart judges is too powerful to break.

Similarly, Dr. Hart details the disastrous consequences of the 1965 Immigration Act and explicitly calls for its repeal, but he is pessimistic about the prospects for doing so.

The most explosive part of the book is its concluding chapter, in which Dr. Hart discusses the various scenarios by which the United States could “fall,” either by breaking up, being extinguished, or losing its political independence and being subsumed into a larger polity. All of these terrible scenarios have vastly increased in likelihood because of the destabilizing and destructive effects of mass immigration.

The “fall” of the United States may even occur without most people even noticing it at the time. “Without any foreign conquest, and without any sharp break, the USA might be transformed into a multinational state without any loyalty to our English origin,” he writes. “In fact, such a process may already be in process.”

During his discussion of causes for American decline, Dr. Hart identifies the most important “by far” as the “loss of pride and confidence.” He blames this on the relentless hate campaign waged against “our ancestors” by educators and the Main Stream Media, leading to a situation in which Americans feel “ashamed of their country.” In other words, Dr. Hart is really talking about a loss of identity.

With his history of the United States, and his frank discussion of the issues endangering its existence, Dr. Hart has performed a valuable service for Americans seeking to reclaim their national identity. For anyone curious about their country’s past and concerned about its future, The Rise And Fall Of The United States (full disclosure: A VDARE book—who else would publish it?) is well worth purchasing.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)

Blacks, Jews and You

Trotsky's study in Mexico City, 2017

Trotsky’s study in Mexico City, 2017

Alexis de Tocqueville wrote in 1835, “Among the ancients, the slave belonged to the same race as his master, and often he was superior to him in education and enlightenment. Freedom alone separated them; freedom once granted, they easily intermingled. The ancients therefore had a very simple means of delivering themselves from slavery and its consequences; this means was emancipation, and when they employed it in a general manner, they succeeded.”

When slaves and masters are biologically identical, full equality between them is possible, post-slavery, but if they are physically distinct, what you’ll have is exactly what the United States must endure, for as long as it exists.

Hypothetically, let’s just say the differences between blacks and whites are only skin deep, that they’re exactly the same otherwise, with equal mental and physical potentials, but even if this is true, black Americans will always be branded, by themselves and others, as descendants of slaves, so this alone will eternally cause social division and discord.

Even Africans who arrive long after slavery ended are colored by this crime, shame and endless source of outrage, just as any white is somehow guilty of all the ramifications of racial slavery, even if he’s Irish, Polish, Czech or a fresh-of-the-boat Moldavian who’s never heard of Abraham Lincoln or Martin Luther King.

Blacks as ex slaves and whites as ex slave drivers has become the cartoony backdrop to all American conversations about race, so that any anti-social or violent act by blacks can be explained away by a mainstream media chorus of black apologists.

Michael Brown, for example, couldn’t help but steal a cigar, shove an Indian clerk out of the way, walk down the middle of the street, ignore a white cop’s command to move onto a sidewalk then, most fatally, reach into the cop’s car to grab officer Darren Wilson and his gun. Now, a man of any color in any country who does that is asking to be shot, and if you were the cop, I’m sure you would have blasted your 6-foot-4, 292-pound assailant also, and this is no he said, she said, for Brown’s DNA was found on Wilson’s weapon, which means that he was right on top of Wilson, and not at a distance, with his hands up.

Truth, though, didn’t get in the way of widespread rioting, Brown’s beatification, the birth of Black Lives Matter, Brown’s mother’s appearance at the National Democratic Convention and her publication of Tell the Truth & Shame the Devil: The Life, Legacy, and Love of My Son Michael Brown, whose kindle edition can be yours for only 99 cents at Amazon.

With the Ferguson riot constantly in the news, I often consulted the St Louis Post Dispatch so, by chance, found out about Daniil Maksimenko. A 22-year-old Bosnian immigrant, Maksimenko was delivering pizza when he was fatally shot by three black men. They didn’t want to risk anyone fingering them for stealing a pizza, I suppose. In contrast to Michael Brown’s death, Maksimenko’s meant absolutely nothing to the black apologists that make up our mainstream media, for there was no analysis or debate, and no concern for his devastated family. Granted, black on white crimes are daily occurrences, so this was hardly a special case. In June of that year, a white woman delivering pizza was stabbed 50 times by two black teens in Cedartown, GA. If the races were reversed, you can be sure the entire world would have heard about these outrageous murders.

As a tireless walker, I must have logged at least a thousand miles through hundreds of cities and towns across the United States, so I’ve seen many black ghettos with ruins of Polish, Italian or Irish churches, or Jewish synagogues. It’s obvious the people who built these had every intention of staying there for generations, so it wasn’t because of racism, but the very real fear of being mugged, killed or raped by blacks that they abandoned their fine homes, dear neighborhoods and magnificent places of worship.

I have a close friend from Singapore who two years ago moved to San Francisco, for work, with his Croatian girlfriend. Since they didn’t know the Mission from the Castro, they innocently rented a tiny room in Bayview, which at $1,280, they deemed expensive enough. They lasted but a few days. He emailed me that “it felt dangerous” just to walk through Bayview to their apartment, so they “desperately” fled to Los Gatos. Once more, it wasn’t racism but a healthy survival instinct that prompted these two to hightail from a neighborhood that’s known for its social justice advocates, anti violence murals and colorful death shrines to murder victims.

Trayvon Martin, though, was killed by a half white, half Hispanic, George Zimmerman, who claimed self defense, and an all-women jury, of five whites and a Hispanic, agreed. Although all grew to dislike Zimmerman, they believed he had to shoot because Martin was sitting on top of him, while raining down blows that bloodied Zimmerman.

Commenting on this case, James Howard Kunstler outlines a culture of young black men that “is oppositional to virtually every other group in America, white, Asian, Hispanic, et cetera, and the only response to it from the jittery ‘others’ is a set of excuses for black opposition and failure.” Most incisively, Kunstler adds:

The Civil Rights victories of 1964 and 1965—the public accommodations act and voting rights act—created tremendous anxiety among African Americans about how they would fit into a desegregated society, so the rise of black separatism at exactly that moment of legislative triumph was not an accident. It offered a segment of the black population the choice of opting out of the new disposition of things. Opting out had consequences, and over several generations since then, the cohort of poorer black Americans has grown only more oppositional, antagonistic, and economically dysfunctional—with the sanction of America’s non-black “diversity” cheerleaders, who remain adamant in their own opposition to the idea of common culture.

During segregation, blacks operated their own country, so to speak, with their own banks, hotels, stores and restaurants, etc., so they were self-sufficient, because they had to be. With integration, blacks can take their money to superior, non-black businesses, and that’s why you see almost no black businesses any more, not even in the blackest neighborhoods. Walk through any black ghetto and you’ll find corner bodegas run by Hispanics, Koreans, Chinese or Arabs, bars owned by whites or Asians, fried food takeouts with bullet-proof plexiglass operated by Chinese or Hispanics, and nail salons run by Vietnamese. Even many ghetto barbers are Chinese or Vietnamese.

In every field besides sports, entertainment and politics, blacks are failing spectacularly against all other races, a fact readily admitted to by blacks and black apologists themselves as evidence of America’s racism and oppression of blacks. America is racist, but so is every other country and person, for racism, at core, is merely an extension and manifestation of innate self-love. One loves oneself, family then nation, which is made up of those that share one’s language, above all, as well as culture and history, if not also a physical similarity.

Loving oneself and kind doesn’t mean having a right to violate anybody else, obviously, and if one favors another race over one’s own, then that, too, is racism. No one is color blind.

Rabbi Nechemia Coopersmith explains, “Wherever we go around the world, we feel that instant connection when we bagel each other. And being part of a big global family means each of us has an international network of people who genuinely care and will help each other […] Every Jew is my responsibility; we are different parts to an organic whole.”

If Rabbi Coopersmith had to give a job or some money to a Jew, German, Muslim, Mongolian or Ugandan, who do you think he would choose?

Watching team sports, racism can be diffused because several races may be present on one’s favorite team, but with individual sports, especially combat ones, racism often comes to the fore, for no one likes to see his approximation being humiliated, beaten bloody or knocked out cold, a sight almost as infuriating as seeing, for blacks, Michael Brown lying face-down in the middle of the road. As whites were being whupped by blacks in actual rings, Rocky had to emerge on the screen to stroke white pride. Similarly, yellows are stoked by Bruce Lee, though he’s actually 3/8th white.

In boxing, the competitive yellows are mostly found in the more ridiculous sounding weight classes, such as straw and junior fly, so when an outlier like Manny Pacquiao dominated as a welterweight, billions of yellows went berserk, but boxing, like all other human endeavors, shows that, no, the races aren’t equal. If you can measure between two of anything, one will come up short. None of this is anybody’s fault, obviously, because we didn’t make ourselves, after all.

In multicultural America, there is one race that has a unique historical grievance against it, and this race is also at the very bottom of society, a situation that promises to be permanent, so black rage will only increase, with plenty of abetting from black apologists.

If blacks can be admitted to universities over better students, given contracts over better firms, hired over more qualified candidates and be harder to fire because of a possible discrimination lawsuit, then aren’t they privileged instead of oppressed? Thanks to state-sponsored racism, even a just-arrived Nigerian millionaire, say, can snap up a set-aside minority contract over an Irish whose family has endured poverty in America for centuries.

This preferential, deferential or condescending treatment is necessary, many will argue, because blacks were held down for so long, but affirmative action taints all black achievements and causes much resentment among those who are bypassed to make room for less competent blacks. Shut up already, they were slaves!

There is another race with a claimed historical grievance, but in this instance, it’s against all of Christendom, for Christians looked the other way, assisted or directly murdered six million Jews, it has been drilled into each Western head.

Holding key posts in American banking, judiciary, media, entertainment and government, Jews have lots of leverage, it’s safe to say, so in still white-majority America, “white” has become a dirty word that connotes genocide, pillage, oppression and undeserved privilege. Since no population would demonize itself so liberally, it’s clear whites themselves don’t control their media and academy.

The media aren’t just a brainwashing tool to control your intellectual, psychological, social and political life, but a blackmailing threat dangling over each politician and potential dissident. With media, you can cowe even the most powerful. Moreover, the constant whitewashing of the worst black behavior usefully divides America and outrages the majority into supporting the militarization of the police, which is already being deployed to browbeat all Americans. Quite openly, the police state burnishes its weapons.

To cripple resistance, minds must be corrupted and characters weakened, so it’s no surprise to see American music becoming progressively more degenerate and/or violent, with black hip hop leading the decay. Much of this has been accomplished under the stewardship of Jewish impresarios such as Lyor Cohen, Todd Moscowitz, Jimmy Iovine, Doug Morris, Lucian Grainge and Leonard Blavatnik, etc.

Jewish Jerry Heller managed NWA, or Niggaz Wit Attitudes, who rapped, “I’m sneaky as fuck when it comes to crime / But I’m a smoke ’em now and not next time / Smoke any motherfucker that sweats me / Or any asshole, that threatens me / I’m a sniper with a hell of a scope / Takin’ out a cop or two, they can’t cope with me.”

For a change, you can enjoy Bone Thugs-N-Harmony, another Heller baby, “Jump up on the Bones dick and ride / Pass the pussy on the left hand side / Bone, bone, bone, bone, bone, bone, bone / Bone, bone, bone, bone, bone.”

Very few, though, dare to even whisper about Jewish power. E.A. Ross wrote in 1911, “In his defense of Flaccus, a Roman governor who had ‘squeezed’ his Jewish subjects, Cicero lowers his voice when he comes to speak of the Jews, for, as he explains to the judges, there are persons who might excite against him this numerous, clannish and powerful element. With much greater reason might an American lower his voice today in discussing two million Hebrew immigrants united by a strong race consciousness and already ably represented at every level of wealth, power, and influence in the United States.”

Then too, Jews fought hard for open borders, “The systematic campaign in newspapers and magazines to break down all arguments for restriction and to calm nativist fears is waged by and for one race. Hebrew money is behind the National Liberal Immigration League and its numerous publications […] In order to admit their brethren from the Pale the brightest of the Semites are keeping our doors open to the dullest of the Aryans!”

As we can now see in the US and Europe, Jews will advocate for open borders even when none of their kind is lined up outside, for to dilute each society but their own is an aim in itself.

For such a glancing exposure of Jewish power, Ross has been flushed down the memory hole, Ron Unz believes, and yet, at the risk of joining Mr. Ross, Unz has now published a series of unflinching articles on, among other things, Jewish collaboration with the Nazis, Jewish guilt in JFK’s assassination and 9/11, and, most remarkably, the elaborate Holocaust myth, as propped up by a shoahload of bogus scholarship and hundreds of tear jerking movies. Unz hasn’t just stuck his neck way out, but placed it on the third rail!

Like Gilad Atzmon, Israel Shamir and others, Unz is opposed to the Jewish ideology, with its we’re the chosen people, and goyim are merely beasts in the shape of men, here only to serve us. Unz is certainly not anti-Jews as an ethnicity, for otherwise, he would be against himself and all members of his extended family.

In any case, if the Holocaust was the most shocking atrocity of World War II, why was there no mention of it for nearly 20 years after the war ended? And why did Anne Frank only die after six months in a “death camp”? Unz, “It seems rather odd to me that a young Jewish girl who fell severely ill at Auschwitz would have spent so much time in camp hospitals and eventually die there, given that we are told the primary purpose of Auschwitz and other such camps was the efficient extermination of its Jewish inmates.”

Unz also exhumes Jacob Schiff to show how this Wall Street banker jump started the Bolshevik Revolution, so it was really a deep hatred of Russia, and not any idealism, that triggered the bloodiest chapter in human history. Though only 4% of Russia’s population, Jews made up 80-85% of the early Soviet government, Unz points out, and they dominated the Gulag administration and the terrifying NKVD.

Since this Jewish-dominated regime killed tens of millions during its first two decades, Unz concludes that “in per capita terms Jews were the greatest mass-murderers of the twentieth century, holding that unfortunate distinction by an enormous margin and with no other nationality coming even remotely close. And yet, by the astonishing alchemy of Hollywood, the greatest killers of the last one hundred years have somehow been transmuted into being seen as the greatest victims, a transformation so seemingly implausible that future generations will surely be left gasping in awe.”

To too many, though, this Jewish role in genocide is only a cause for celebration, not shame or remorse. In 2016, the Times of Israel published a gushing portrait of “a strikingly handsome radical-revolutionary, Lev Davidovich Bronstein—otherwise known as Leon Trotsky.” “He founded the Red Army, commanding it with vicious blood-thirsty gusto.”

In Mexico City last year, I visited the home of Trotsky’s brief squeeze, Frida Kahlo, and found it to be an elegant, comfortable and spacious compound. There, I inspected old, large canvases of Kahlo’s ancestors, and noticed, hovering over her daybed, the stern faces of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin and Mao. Bemused, I perused one of Kahlo’s last oils, a self-portrait, as usual, but with a giant head of Stalin, the man who had ordered the assassination of Trotsky. Safe in her wealth, Frida loved both of these world-class butchers.

In the very heart of Mexico City, just on the edge of beautiful Alameda Park, is El Museo Memoria y Tolerancia. Passing by, I noticed a cattle car, of the type that transferred Jews to the “death” camps. Inside, there’s the Holocaust and Tolerance Education Center. As many Mexicans as possible must be inducted into the Jews as greatest victims ever cult.

Like blacks with slavery, Jews use the Holocaust to silence all critics. Thus immuned, they can continue to slaughter Palestinians, wreck more Muslim countries, push refugees into Europe and fragment societies. If you push back, you’re a gas chamber loving Nazi.

Pinched by two eternally aggrieved forces, does the pale huperson even stand a Chinaman’s chance?

Linh Dinh’s latest books are Postcards from the End of America (non-fiction) and A Mere Rica (poetry). He maintains a regularly updated photo blog.

Armed antifa group calls for the “slaughter” of President Trump

Armed antifa group calls for the “slaughter” of President Trump

Armed antifa group calls for the “slaughter” of President Trump

It seems like each day the violent rhetoric from antifa and other far-left extremist groups becomes more militant. In a recent blog post from the far-left site, Incendiary News, the author advocates for the “slaughter” of ICE agents and their bosses (Donald Trump). This rhetoric is fueled in part by the growing influence of Marxism on the left as well as a media industrial complex that routinely distorts, misrepresents, and sometimes even fabricates information in order to paint President Trump and his supporters as “fascists” or “white supremacists”.

Incendiary News covers “people’s struggles and news on revolutionary orgs in the US and internationally” and is run by the far-left extremist group Red Guards – Austin (RGA)They primarily focus on the work of domestic communist extremist groups but also occasionally weigh in with support for foreign terrorist organizations, like the Taliban, in some cases even celebrating the murder of U.S. soldiers.

In a recent blog post they shared on Twitter and Facebook, the author lays out his desire to see ICE agents and other government officials including the President “slaughtered”:

This author only hopes that this chapter in American history will also include the moment when revolutionaries rose up with the masses and slaughtered the fascistic Border Patrol dogs and their bosses, slaying them with revolutionary fire and justice.

He then praises the work of the violent extremist group, Red Guards (not surprising considering it is their website):

Revolutionary organizations throughout the country such as the Red Guards appear to be organizing among the immigrant masses in forming defense units, rallying around the shared slogan of “fight ICE with fire!”

As the Red Guards and their supporters have said in the recent past, the time for activism is over. Now is the time for war. Now is the time to mobilize the masses, particularly the immigrant masses from Central America and Mexico, to exact revolutionary vengeance and seize power.

Red Guards Austin torch an effigy of Donald Trump – Source: RGA Facebook page


This militant rhetoric is a continuation of previous statements from these cells which include open calls for “revolutionary violence” and “armed resistance”. This antifa group is just one of many violent communist cells now openly operating across the country. We have previously reported on similar cells herehere, and here.

Like many antifa groups, Red Guards cells use social media to recruit, radicalize, and mobilize other far-left extremists. Their flagship cell, Red Guards – Austin, has almost eight thousand Facebook followers. While big tech companies have been systematically censoring conservatives and right-of-center influencers, violent far-left groups are free to openly violate the Terms of Service for these platforms without any consequences.

With the information we have provided as well as our previous reports there should be zero doubt that the Red Guards constitutes a legitimate security concern. Considering that just over a year ago a far-left extremist opened fire on a GOP Congressional baseball practice game, I sincerely hope our reporting results in an investigation by the authorities. Here is how you can take just a few minutes and help us make sure that happens:

Action Plan:

  1. Submit a tip to the FBI. Make sure to include this article in your in you report.
  2. Share this article and tag @FBI and @ICEGov
  3. Send this article to media outlets, local law enforcement agencies, and elected officials

The mission of Far Left Watch is to investigate, expose, and combat the far-left. Please share this article via Twitter, Facebook, etc. and encourage friendly media and YouTube content creators to report on this information.

Have you heard about Dr. Angus Menuge’s ontological argument against naturalism?


Soldiers of the 101st Airborne Division test the new M-17 pistol

My friend Seth mentioned to me that he likes the argument from reason, so I thought I would post something about it from a Christian scholar who I really admire. Dr. Angus Menuge offers the best (I think) argument for the proposition that theism is the best ground for our reasoning capability.

Let’s start with some information about Dr. Menuge:

Dr. Angus Menuge joined Concordia University Wisconsin in 1991. He earned his BA from the University of Warwick, England, and his MA and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where he studied philosophy, computer science and psychology. Menuge’s dissertation was on the philosophy of action explanation, and his current research interests include philosophy of mind, philosophy of science and Christian apologetics.

In 2003, Menuge earned a Diploma in Christian Apologetics from the International Academy of Apologetics, Evangelism…

View original post 798 more words

Fake Reporters Stand in Ponds & Lean Into The Wind; Real Reporters Confront Black Looters (Video)

The Roper Report

Her attempts to shame them are utterly futile. The (nonWhite) Democrat base knows no shame. Hasn’t even the faintest concept of it. And it’s only a question of when the left, which believes that looting is a human right, decides to label her something alliterative, e.g. Permit Patty, and demand her firing. (for racism)

When a hurricane comes, fake reporters stand in ponds or lean into the wind. Real reporters confront looters, as this brave woman, Chelsea Donovan of WECT, does in North Carolina, chasing them down and demanding answers.

Watch Video Here

A little flashback courtesy of Newsweek.

“As the day wore on, the turmoil increased. Looting and burning swept down 14th Street and 7th Street, two of the ghetto’s main thoroughfares, then spread south to the shopping district just east of the White House. On the sidewalk in front of the Justice Department’s headquarters on Pennsylvania Avenue, shirt-sleeved…

View original post 437 more words

The Kakistocracy

Striving for a flattering eulogy

Cambria Will Not Yield

Keep these fighting words before ye

William M. Briggs

Statistician to the Stars!

The Orthosphere

Wherever an altar is found, there civilization exists - Joseph de Maistre

Additional survival tricks

find North, navigation, survival, How to? Money, Social Issues

The Last Refuge

Rag Tag Bunch of Conservative Misfits - Contact Info: TheLastRefuge@reagan.com

The Defensive Training Group

Discussion to Help Your Edge Against Bad Things


We don't have to live like this.

Softer Side Of The Movement

Noble breed kindred

The Ludwig von Mises Centre

For Property and Freedom

The Roper Report

Billy's Balkanization Blog

The ShieldWall Network

Community Grassroots Patriotic Outreach and Organization

The Patrick Henry Society

Intelligence, Tech, and Privacy

Mason Dixon Survivalist Association

Be a Survivalist who is a “Jack of all Trades”, master of some (preferably the life saving and life protecting arts).


Nous Defions!

Forward Observer

Threat Intelligence

Mason Dixon Tactical

Defense and Wilderness Survival Training, Equipment, and Consultation