How to Survive Communism in the USA?

TOM SUNIC • SEPTEMBER 7, 2020 • 2,800 WORDS • 21 COMMENTS • REPLYTweetRedditShareShareEmailPrintMore RSS

The fundamental mistake made by most American conservatives, both old and new, is to think of communism solely as a violent ideology designed to abolish private property. During the so-called Cold War, they imagined that by mimicking some communist practices they could tone down the very real communist threat and elicit some Soviet sympathy. They should have been more careful what they wished for. The reason why communism fell apart in the early 1990s in the communist East was due to the fact that communist ideologemes, such as the idea of progress, economic equality, and the instauration of a borderless and multiracial society, had been more successfully put into practice in the capitalist West than in the communist East — albeit under a less abrasive name and without resorting to a large scale state terror.

For many Americans, surviving communism is therefore a contradiction in terms given that they have already fully aligned themselves to the System, i.e., “the deep state”, oblivious to its repressive crypto-communistic principles. Unsurviving communism, by contrast, is a destiny of a hapless few who are prepared to live a life of dissent — and also pay a heavy price for their non-conformist views.

Modern day neo-communist BLM and antifascist activists in the US know well that parading with the name of communism could backfire. Their self-ascribed title “antifa” resonates far better in the ears and eyes of the modern media. Many of them, including many of their Democratic party overlords are heirs to a now defunct Homo sovieticusspecies who once thrived in communist countries of Eastern Europe. The twin brotherhood between former Homo sovieticus and the present Homo americanushas had a very long history irrespective of their often feigned feuds and fake semantic posturing.[1] Given that the US, since its inception, has also been involved in a large number of world-improving projects, not least its century-long messianic virtue-signaling adventures aimed at elevating foreign peoples world-wide to a global City on the Hill, it was to be expected that at some point the communist temptation would gain in popularity in a new garb and hit home in the US. For example, US campuses continue to be the main breeding ground of antifa activists, having now more of their adepts than campuses in Western Europe where, over the last decade, there has been a noticeable recycling to populism and nationalism by many former leftist, but also Jewish authors (Michel OnfrayAlain SoralEric Zemmour). In post-communist Eastern Europe, organized antifa groups and their LGBT sidekicks are virtually non-existent, except when temporarily hired and exported by EU or State Department-sponsored NGOs in order to unseat some local populist and anti-globalist ruler. Hatred against antifas in all segments of East European society is understandable given that for many the term antifascism rings the bell of communism. Worth recalling is that words and locutions containing nouns or modifiers related to the word “antifascism” were in surplus in all official communist documents in Eastern Europe, even on marriage certificates, lasting well into the late 1950s. During the Cold War, and without any exception, all East European dissidents were squarely depicted in communist court proceedings as fascist agents.

The brainwashing of young American masses by the word antifascism owes much to the early Bolshevik agitator Leo Trotsky and his collection of essays under the title What is Fascism and how to Fight it,[2] in which he depicts fascism as the ultimate stage of capitalism and showing how communists in the USA must smash it:

The backwardness of the United State working class is only a relative term. In very many important respects, it is the most progressive working class of the world, technically and in its standard of living…The next historic wave in the United States will be the wave of radicalism of the masses, not fascism. Of course, the war can hinder the radicalization for some time, but then it will give to the radicalization a more tremendous tempo and swing.[3]

The recent antifa riots in many large cities in USA are also a belated follow-up on riots carried out by antifa “sixty-eighters” half a century ago all over the West.[4] They were successful in imposing communist cultural hegemony in higher education and in paving the way, a decade later, for the political takeover by the Left. Sixty-eighters spawned the modern-day antifa. However, neither the psychology of sixty-eighters, nor their modern antifa offshoots can be fully grasped if one loses sight of the world order created jointly by the capitalist US and the communist Soviet Union in 1945, both being part of the common antifascist block. In the final analysis, the entire West, with America at the helm, is unable to repudiate modern antifa activists, let alone declare them a terrorist organisation, unless it first revises its own writing of the history of World War II and overhauls its own system of liberal governance.

The antifa mindset

Apart from the Gulag system and the topography of its countless killing fields, Communism must first and foremost be analysed as an anthropology, or better yet as a widespread social pathology, albeit savored and craved subconsciously by a very large number of its future victims. The obsession with the idea of equality and equal redistribution of goods and capital is as old as humanity itself irrespective of the name this obsession may carry in different countries and epochs. Several undeservedly forgotten authors such as Claude Polin and Alexander Zinoviev, already quoted in TOO on several occasions, long ago noted that it is a deadly mistake to view communism as the terror of the few against many; rather, “it is the terror of all against all at every moment.”

As the flower and crowning glory of communality, communism represents a type of society which is nearest and dearest to the masses no matter how dreadful the potential consequences for them might be.[5]

Long ago I wrote, based on the analyses of these and other authors dealing with the communist anthropology, that the faith in communism presupposes first and foremost a peculiar mindset whose historical realization has been made possible by primordial egalitarian impulses followed by negative socio-biological selection. Throughout man’s biocultural evolution egalitarian instincts have been held in check by cultural institutions and racial in-group constraints. With the advent of the mass multiracial system, deceptively called democracy, resistance to these animalistic and inborn instincts is becoming virtually impossible.

The contemporary USA is a good place to study the proto-communist mindset. The very abstract eighteenth-century Enlightenment-egalitarian-inspired statement in the Declaration of Independence that “all men are created equal” was bound to open up a Pandora box of wishful thinking all over Europe, also opening, two hundred years later, the floodgates of non-European immigration. Those do-good romantic Jeffersonian words had a specific meaning in his epoch and for his fellow travellers; today they are being differently interpreted by US lawyers of Mexican, Asian or African ancestry, let alone by their illiterate or semi-literate, lower-IQ clients arriving in droves to America from Asia, Africa, or Latin America.

It is also a great self-delusion common to many American conservatives, both old and new, to imagine that they can avert the rise of communism by preaching the capitalist gospel of permanent economic growth. Contrary to a well-entrenched communist-Trotskyite dogma, communism can very well thrive in and within a capitalist free market economy. In view of the coming shortages of resources and the surge in the surplus of uprooted people, the communist experiment seems to be the only functional and viable system for the future of the world. Unlike any system hitherto in the history of mankind communism offers an effortless society, psychological predictability and economic security, however meager, bleak or frugal they may all be. Worse, communism increases the basest human instincts, which can best be seen in the violent behavior of US antifa rioters. Communism is the ideal system for any multiracial state composed of gregarious masses, consumer-minded citizens and lower-IQ individuals.

It is another well-spread hoax doctored up by Leon Trotsky that communists are archenemies of capitalism. The case of modern China, a country the size of the US, bears witness that in an overpopulated society facing scarce resources, the communist ruling oligarchy can work hand in hand with liberal free marketeers, creating large differences in wealth. Similar to Germany’s numerous antifa organisations, including the powerful and well-funded German Amadeu Antonio Stiftung , the activities of modern day antifa in America are also profusely funded by wealthy financiers, international corporations, and individuals, with a billionaire George Soros being the best known. Finally, from the geopolitical perspective it must not be forgotten that antifascist guerillas during World War II in Europe would have not lasted a week had they not been supported by the US and UK massive financial and military aid handed out to their sponsor in the Soviet Union.

Most American conservatives are supportive of communistic legal practices such as affirmative action, forgetting that the same “positive” racial discrimination legislation, albeit differently worded, was part and parcel of the Soviet system whose goal was to strike a balance between 16 former Soviet republics containing dozens of competing and feuding nationalities and ethnic groups. The passing of the Civil Rights Act in 1964 was quite in line with the American Cold War wish to neutralize the Soviet threat by doubling down on the same Soviet legal practices, that is, the re-enactment of the multiracial system already laid down in the Soviet constitution of 1936. But, unlike in the Soviet Union — the dogma of multiculturalism and legal provisions on affirmative action are still alive and kicking in America.

The good news is that even if American communists, under the banner of Antifascism or Democratism, or Liberalism come to power in the US they will soon start eliminating each other. This would be fully in accordance with the iron law of egalitarian entropy, a fact often overlooked by many analysts of communism. The still-strong myth that communists and antifas only enjoyed killing anti-communists and fascists during and after World War II must be dismissed. In fact, ever since their coming to power communists and antifas in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, in 1917 and 1945 respectively, were involved in the orgy of mutual purges and killings. It must be expected that American antifas or liberals, or whatever they may name themselves in the near future, will start, once in power, with similar mutual killings. Virtually all big masterminds of communist mass killings during the pre-WWII and the post-WWII Soviet era, heads of powerful Soviet secret police agencies ( Genrikh YagodaLavrentiy BeriaNikolai YezhovLev Kamenev ) were at some point demoted or ended up themselves on the gallows erected by their former communist comrades. A fresh example of latent communist entropy transpiring in incessant intra-communist warfare could be observed on the eve of the violent break-up of multicultural communist Yugoslavia in 1991, falsely ascribed by the foreign media to local nationalists. However, a closer look at the profile of major decision makers in seceding ex-Yugoslav republics points to their common communist past. Similarly, on a positive side, if one carefully looks at the pedigree, or reads the early works of some of the best and brightest anti-Communist analysts and writers (Boris SouvarineArthur KoestlerGeorge OrwellAnte Ciliga), one can notice that they were at some point in their life ardent supporters of antifascism and communism.

Reductio ad hitlerum; reductio ad iudaeorom

The language arsenal of modern American antifa activists is another field of study that merits closer psycholinguistic attention. Antifa rioters and their college mentors, along with pro-communist US main media outlets, including a large number of their Democratic party coaches are using a revised communist jargon borrowed from the defunct Soviet Union. The Soviet talk was once the daily menu of the communist propaganda in Eastern Europe, its goal being to dehumanize, demonize and criminalize political opponents. The language processing was simple — it consisted in reversing the meaning of words and redefining political concepts. Similar practice can be observed today in the US amongst modern antifa activists and main media outlets who resort to the principles of reductio ad absurdum, that is, they posit propositions that elicit contradictory yet self-serving conclusions. Along these reductionist lines of verbal sophistry, the process of vilifying Whites as fascists is being facilitated by the methodological tool of reductio ad hitlerum. By now this equation, i.e., Whites = Fascists has become a standard practice in social science studies and in the media in the US. For modern antifa rioters in the US, the word fascism is a pivotal killer-shut-up word. Once uttered it disables any communication. This word, however, has completely lost its original political designation, standing now instead for a synonym of the absolute cosmic evil.

The same verbal demonizing wordings apply to another killer-word i.e. “Nazism,” a derogatory hyperbolic abbreviation of the word in usage since 1945. The word ‘Nazi’, however, was never used in the official National-Socialist documents or academic journals in Germany from 1933–45. Ironically, it first appeared in the late 1920s as a deriding title of the book Der Nazi-Sozi[6] written as a short lampooning manifestoagainst Jews, Communists and capitalists by Joseph Goebbels, who was to become in 1933 the main figure of the NS German propaganda war.

Using the pejorative word ‘Nazi’ today is the equivalent of the pejorative word “commie”, the difference being, however, that in a polite academic company in the US, or in academic journals nobody would ever use the word ‘commie’ in the description of communists. The whole array of new euphemisms, as well as torrents of killer-words have been manufactured over the last fifty years in the US , such as “white supremacism,” “ hate speech,” “affirmative action,” “Afro-Americans” instead of Negroes, the modifying adjective “Jewish” instead of a more piercing noun ‘Jew’, with most of these words being taken now as a commonplace either when criminalizing political opponents or when praising non-Europeans to the skies. When inspecting the prose of many leftist or Jewish-run journals or pro-Jewish news agencies in the USA, such as the SPLC or ADL, it becomes obvious that they function primarily as antifa educational loudspeakers when blaring on all frequencies the demonizing labels neo-Nazis, white supremacists, or fascists.

Historical amicability of a large number of Jewish-American intellectuals for antifascist projects have been amply documented by Kevin MacDonald. Most Jewish-American authors, for obvious reasons, are pretty tacit when it comes to analyzing the high percentage of leading Communists officials of Jewish origin in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union and their role in early communist-antifa movements, as well as their role in the establishment of repressive communist regimes. The very large overrepresentation of liberal-leftist Jews in the major media and elite academic institutions, as well as in financial contributions to political causes of the left, has also been critical in creating the culture of White guilt and fanning the flames of the communist temptation in contemporary America.

However, reducing the birth and the spread of communism, including its modern version of antifascism to Jewish intellectuals and activists is not the whole story; it means ignoring the all-encompassing, indeed democratic reality of the communist temptation. Gentile communist auxiliaries, reared in the culture of White guilt, operate as willing executioners; they fear being suspected of a lax attitude toward non-communist foes, or harboring themselves latent anti-Semitic feelings, and they often outperform their Jewish-communist comrades. It is no accident that the frontmen in modern antifa riots in US cities today are mostly troubled White individuals who have lost the sense of identity and who, driven by feelings of historical guilt (as is the case with most academics in Germany), look for atonement by becoming the loudest sympathizers or standard-bearers of antifascism.

Removing the communist temptation presupposes cleaning up the swamp, first in American higher education and then in defunding departments of humanities in all colleges. In order to do that, the fallacy of multiculturalism needs to be discarded; it has never worked anywhere in the world. It has always been a recipe for disaster and civil wars all over the world. Abandoned policies of racial segregation must be reconsidered as a viable option for a functional society. It is better to have fences than cohabiting with an alien partner in a fake marriage. Prior to that, however, the whole idea of progress, still strongly embedded in the American dream, needs to be re-examined. Of course, this may all sound like wishful thinking because, as we have seen thousands of times in history, it is the size of someone’s sword which only makes the difference between good and evil.

Notes

[1] T. Sunic, prefaced by Kevin MacDonald, Homo americanus; Child of the Postmodern Age (Arktos, 2018), pp. 34-70.

[2] Leon Trotsky (Pathfinder, 1969).

[3] Ibid. “The Perspective in the United States,” published first in Fourth International, October 1940.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1944/1944-fas.htm

[4] T. Sunic, “Sixty-Eighters”, Chronicles of American Culture, March 1999.

[5] Alexander Zinoviev, The Reality of Communism (London: Victor Gollancz), p.28.

[6] Joseph Goebbels, Der Nazi-Sozi; Fragen und Antworten für den Nationalsozialisten, (Elberfeld, 1926). In English trans.: https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/nazi-sozi.htm(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)

“How to Survive Communism in the USA?”
• 21 CommentsCommenters to Ignore…to FollowEndorsed OnlyTrim Comments? NoShortLong

  1. Gareth says:September 7, 2020 at 8:04 pm GMT   An excellent and interesting article Tom. Thank you. Always a pleasure to both listen to and read you.REPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER 
  2. Ronnie Waters says:September 7, 2020 at 8:44 pm GMT • 100 Words   One thing is very clear. We need to focus on solutions rather than the problem. Moderate conservatives might as well be antifa/blm at this point. Traditional conservatives are just bad news porn junkies that wave flags. I don’t know how you cut off the head of the snake since the snake seems to have so many heads. The only somewhat positive situation I see is the attacking of “easy targets” like statues, churches, and flag wavers. That leaves us to operate somewhat “under the radar”. But, now with these fanatics attacking restaurants and suburbs it may have to come to a rebirth of a real national right ie. (if there ever was such a thing as a national right).• Replies: @RoatanBillREPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER THIS THREAD HIDE THREAD 
  3. Anonymous[118] • Disclaimer says:September 7, 2020 at 9:57 pm GMT • 100 Words   Calling yourself something doesn’t make it so. What you are overlooking are the defining characteristics if the ideologies you are comparing. Look at BLM and antifa’s platform and try to find anything about class struggle. No, what you see is that the obvious subject of their movement is race. This is a fascist model used by the national socialists. The name antifa itself is a type of Orwellian doublespeak not something evocative of communism.• Replies: @animalogicREPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER THIS THREAD HIDE THREAD 
  4. RoatanBill says:September 7, 2020 at 10:54 pm GMT • 100 Words   @Ronnie WatersI don’t know about a national right, but I do know that what’s needed is a gun toting community that’s not inclined to take any shit from anyone, including the political class (prosecutors, judges, mayors, governors, etc).A take no prisoners attitude means no need for treating their wounded and no secondary attacks from their recovered because there won’t be any.• Replies: @mark tapleyREPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER THIS THREAD HIDE THREAD 
  5. Anonymous[179] • Disclaimer says:September 8, 2020 at 12:42 am GMT • 100 Words   what a gay ass boomer article.The boomer inability to accurately describe their opponents( i.e. calling everything communism) is a serious handicap to their cause.conflating criticism of capitalism’s excesses with identity politics and tech censorship will not win you the capitalism skeptical youth who deal with the negatives of wealth-power concentration.It is a shame coronavirus wasn’t the boomer remover it was promised to be.REPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER 
  6. Alvin says:September 8, 2020 at 7:24 am GMT   I sometimes wonder if what these kids really need — other than a good beating — is to experience real-life communism. Maybe after realizing what a hell-hole it actually is, they will stop with the nonsense. Portland seems like a good place for that experiment. It’s almost there.• Replies: @mark tapleyREPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER THIS THREAD HIDE THREAD 
  7. animalogic says:September 8, 2020 at 10:46 am GMT • 200 Words   @Anonymous“Calling yourself something doesn’t make it so.” Absolutely.““When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’’The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’’The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master — that’s all.”This article is to scholarship as finger painting is to art.
    Start with the conclusion: near everything is “communist” & then force facts to fit that conclusion.“Contrary to a well-entrenched communist-Trotskyite dogma, communism can very well thrive in and within a capitalist free market economy.”What on earth can that mean ? Except that ANY economy/society can be called “communist” ?
    China ? Communist ? Really ? Or a one party state with socialist/capitalist elements?
    Antifa ? Communist ? Or a motley stew of so-called progressive knee-jerks, lacking a Party, a Policy or a leadership ? In short an ugly abortion.
    Oh, & the biggest giggle ? US Jews are communists ! A crew more dedicated to their own communal power & wealth its hard to imagine. And sure, they want to SHARE that wealth & power with the “community”….LOL
    Playing around with words & concepts is like throwing dirt into water….• Replies: @fnn@JaegoREPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER THIS THREAD HIDE THREAD 
  8. Mikael says:September 8, 2020 at 11:48 am GMT • 100 Words   Thank you Tom, from an unsurvivor.Please take a look at “The Crisis of Modernity” by Augusto Del Noce. It comes to the same conclusions and some more, with excellent deductions.Based on it, my personal conclusion has been the “the pursuit of happiness” was an even worse flaw in the American foundation than egalitarian thought, the latter dependent on whether one interprets it as equality-of-opportunity or equality-of-outcome, while the former is always completely arbitrary.The US, and by extension the “West”, are running on fumes of Christianity. Not institutionalized Christianity. The above statement already contains the only solution out of the Dilemma.
    Many readers won’t like to hear such, please take into account I’ve been a life-long atheist until a few years ago.• Replies: @Tom Sunic,REPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER THIS THREAD HIDE THREAD 
  9. Jake says:September 8, 2020 at 11:59 am GMT • 100 Words   That is an extremely important opening sentence. What communism is about at its rock bottom base is replacing Christ and Christendom. That can be done with denying virtually all private property to people or by promoting vulture capitalism; by promoting atheism or by promoting a communistic-tinted Islam; by promoting all things queer or by promoting stiff shirt collar Scientism; by promoting Eastern thought and religion or by promoting Judaizing Evangelicalism.All are anti-Christendom.• Agree: mark tapleyREPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER 
  10. mark tapley says:September 8, 2020 at 12:08 pm GMT • 700 Words   The first thing to understand is that communism although always portrayed as a movement of the downtrodden masses at the bottom, it is the exact opposite, a movement installed by the elite at the very top. International banker and Rothschild associate Jacob Schiff (great grandfather of Al Gore’s daughter’s husband) and investor of 20 million dollars (in 1917 dollars) said “I don’t call it communism but rather Judaism.” The Bolshevik takeover of Russia (a wholly Jew controlled enterprise) required many other investors in order to succeed in the plunder of the country and the starvation and murder of approximately 30 million. The American banks that put up money were Guggenheim, Max Breitung, Kuhn Loeb and Co. Several European banks were also involved. All Jews. This huge endeavor was supported by the Zionist controlled Wilson administration (Hoover ran aid food aid program that kept the Bolsheviks going) and by many Wall St. interests. All of this is documented by Hoover Institute researcher Anthony Sutton in his book “Wall St. and the Bolshevik Revolution.”It still took about 8 years to subdue the whole country. Only continual and massive agricultural, industrial and financial aid kept this phony regime from collapsing. At the end of the Cold War period when many people were finally seeing the whole thing was a scam, it was allowed to fall apart as originally planned. In 1989 this crumbling propped up facade was producing less grain than when under the Tzar. victor Marsden an English journalist during the first world war described Lenin as ‘a Calmyc Jew married to a Jewess, whose children spoke Yiddish.” The Morning Post at the time published the names and identities of the Soviet Gov. 50 top functionaries. they were about 98% Jews. Marsden again reports that of 545 leading Bolshevik officials, 477 were Jews.Lets look at the so called father of communism Karl Marx (Moses Mordecai Levy). Again the Jew MSM and court historians paint a picture of a low class revolutionary of the downtrodden masses. Nothing could be further from the truth. Marx was from a wealthy family of Rabbis. His Aunt was married to a Rothschild and his uncle was the immensely wealthy Lyon Philips, founder of Philips Corp. He supported Marx his whole life. Marx wife Jenny Westphalen was from double royalty. One side being Prussian aristocracy and on the other being a direct descendent of the Stuarts (probably Crypto Jews) of Scotland. Do you think she would have married a Jew nobody?Marx (Levy) job was to keep the Proletariat divided and disorganized especially from their natural allies the Bourgeoisie (middle class) so the new industrial elites could maintain lower wages and wore conditions. Marx job was also to rail against the old monarchies and pave the way for the new European “democracies” – governments run by Jews (like Jewmerica). The goal of all of this is in Marx no. 1 plank of his manifesto, then abolition of all private property. The rest of the planks are really just to accomplish no. 1. The elite (Zionists) know that when the goyim have lost all property rights then all other liberties will not be far behind.Marx intended to dedicate his Communist Manifesto to Charles Darwin because of Darwin’s immense contribution of the evolutionary garbage which is the other side of the coin to communism. Both philosophies were planted to dethrone God and place mankind in the Hegelian world of just another livestock to be managed on the ?zionist elites plantation. Darwin wrote Marx and persuaded him not to let the cat out of the bag. Darwin knew nothing of DNA or the requirement for information to be coded into all organisms. God crowns mankind as his greatest creation, as a special being with a soul, just a little lower than the angels not just an uppity barnyard animal.The current riots are just a continuation of Marx program further refined by the all Jew Frankfurt School to be used to destroy all western (the no. 1 obstacle) nations by attacking all institutions, customs, mores and values of the old system. All the nations are to be replaced by the global tyranny of a new and austere feudal system planned from before Marx.REPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER 
  11. fnn says:September 8, 2020 at 12:41 pm GMT   @animalogicOr a motley stew of so-called progressive knee-jerks, lacking a Party, a Policy or a leadership ? In short an ugly abortion.You’ve produced the murkiest language in this entire discussion.REPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER THIS THREAD HIDE THREAD 
  12. Juri says:September 8, 2020 at 3:43 pm GMT • 200 Words   There is nothing West can do with communism problem now. Nazi myth and all equal myth are ultimate obstacles.2-4% of white people are mentally ill and they are the root cause of every last madness in the white civilization.Talking about America, even separation is not a solution. Without removing mentally ill white people, those new countries will become Sweden or UK or just huge college campuses.Removing those people demands 2 things. Give up the Nazi myth. Those evil Nazis were just like people in the West today rising up against madness. They were not ultimate evil and war against Germany was not good war, it was bad war.The second thing is all equal myth. Some people are mad. Despite PhD,s or whatever, they are still mad. So getting rid of equality is the second step against communists.Now the problem. Most people can,t admit that their life time beliefs are just fat lies. Normalizing Nazis and declaring Constitution wrong is beyond average person thinking capability. This makes the understanding and solving communism problem impossible.REPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER 
  13. Tom Sunic, says: • WebsiteSeptember 8, 2020 at 4:26 pm GMT   @MikaelDel Noce is fine. This was his thesis originally. But Evola also pointed to that parallel- much earlier. I am discussing this parallel in my book.https://arktos.com/product/homo-americanus-child-of-the-postmodern-age/REPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER THIS THREAD HIDE THREAD 
  14. mark tapley says:September 8, 2020 at 5:58 pm GMT • 100 Words   @AlvinNot well known but back in the 30’s the Jew media was always extolling the wonders of the workers paradise in the Soviet Union. Wall St. was pouring huge amounts of money into the five year programs and this network of Gulags run by the Jews was promoted as our great ally. Several thousand Americans gave away their possessions, got on ships and went over to Russia to experience this carefree lifestyle. As soon as they got off the boat they were carted off to the Gulags where virtually all of them perished. Van Rosenvelt and his New Deal Jews must have thought this was hilarious.REPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER THIS THREAD HIDE THREAD 
  15. mark tapley says:September 8, 2020 at 6:27 pm GMT • 200 Words   @RoatanBillThe Zionists know that at least 90% of the goyim will just do as their told and believe whatever MSM lies they are told. We know this is the case because all the government had to do was tell them there was a virus (don’t bother to check the history on all the other fake viruses) you need to get tested (even if you are not sick and the test has been proven to be totally bogus) and believe all these numbers from the criminals at the CDC-WHO (when just like in the other fake viruses including AIDS they took practically all mortalities and called it covid) so the idiots will quarantine themselves, close their businesses and wear the moisture and germ laden face diapers that would be counterproductive even if there were a virus.It wouldn’t do most of them any good if they were armed. They are already conditioned to be docile barnyard assess as they are herded on further down the road to be ultimately corralled in the U.N.’s Agenda 2030-21.• Replies: @RoatanBillREPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER THIS THREAD HIDE THREAD 
  16. RoatanBill says:September 8, 2020 at 7:10 pm GMT • 200 Words   @mark tapleySadly, you’re correct. I can’t get my siblings to wake up, never mind strangers.Eventually, some gov’t statistics will be announced to compare the death rate for 2020 with previous years. If those lies are at least partially accurate, the deaths attributable to the spooky virus might present themselves, along with the deaths due to canceled surgeries and a general lessening of medical availability during the panic. We will never know the actual truth.When people’s stomachs start to ache because they’ve lost their income or worse are now homeless after evictions kick in, maybe then folks will be more receptive to what they now consider tin foil hat nonsense. Average folks will eventually realize their welfare is severely threatened sooner or late.If evictions are not allowed to proceed, then landlords will rebel because they become a new form of privately supplied welfare, and they don’t have a currency printing press.Couple all the riots and political propaganda with the facts of weather cause lower crop yields and that we are entering a grand solar minimum to shorten growing seasons and shift growing belts, things are just not looking all that rosy regardless of which figurehead is installed in the oval office.REPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER THIS THREAD HIDE THREAD 
  17. Mikael_ says:September 8, 2020 at 8:15 pm GMT • 300 Words   Thank you.
    Just read the excerpts on The West’s Darkest Hour blog.Reminds me how after reading Del Noce’s critique of the Sexual Revolution, I got the sinking feeling that the obvious future pendulum backswing would be towards strict Puritan again… maybe even somewhat reasonably!? That’s when Del Noce stumped me, when later mentioning in passing that he sees Puritanism as gnostic.But to me personally Del Noce’s most consequential thesis (besides “marketing character”, permissive society, limitlessness [from Domenach?], novelty, positivism, history & authority) is about perfectism, and its automatic, unavoidable progress into totalitarianism.
    I derived from it that the key distinction of Christianity to all other religions is recognizing the issue, and moving perfectism as to be only achievable in the afterworld. We can still strive without end to make things better, but it’s categorically impossible to ever get even close to large-scale perfectism on earth. But that is almost entirely forgotten in Catholic, and for sure in Protestant churches, i.e. in institutionalized Christianity. And the US was actually built around that oblivion.
    And it seems to me -I’m not well read enough yet to make stronger statements- that deep thinkers such as Hegel, Nietzsche etc. couldn’t let go of their perfectist striving, even when they had completely cornered themselves philosophically.
    And I’m stating all this as a small-scale perfectionist myself. Beyond that I believe I’m living proof for Dostoevsky “who regarded atheism pushed to the highest degree as the condition for the discovery of God.”Note: “moralin-sauer” is still an, if rarely used, German word meaning something like excessive, slightly suffocating morality.REPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER 
  18. Adûnâi says: • WebsiteSeptember 8, 2020 at 10:54 pm GMT • 200 Words   Stop blaming Communism. This madness is a creation of Christian Aryandom. America and W Europe are the only land in the world which promotes homosexualism, transvestitism and Negrophilia. Russia only decriminalized LGBT when Christian liberaloids took power under Gorbachev in 1989.It is in our filthy souls to hate our race. The Anglos betrayed Hitler in 1940 by not allying with Germany to genocide the Russians and the Ukrainians. Conversely, Khrushchev threw out the sacred body of the Russian Hero Stalin out of the Mausoleum in October 1961.Chechar from the WDH blog has hailed you, Tom Sunic, as an anti-Christian. And now you come out as an equal to a neo-Nazi 9/11 truther seeing Communism in everything created in truth by Christians?
    https://chechar.wordpress.com/category/tom-sunic/It is precisely in the non-Aryan Socialist DPR of Korea where the flame of hateful anti-Christianity burns bright to-day, alone in the world. Where else will you see such beauty as thousands of anti-Christians marching in the night for the glory of their proud race?
    https://www.youtube.com/embed/OZTeVCC8XaE?feature=oembedIsn’t it remarkable how there is a country promoting such Order and Beauty not seen since the days of Hitler, and yet the best among the Aryans remain oblivious to the legacy of Kimjongilia?REPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER 
  19. anonymous[473] • Disclaimer says:September 8, 2020 at 10:59 pm GMT   An Irony Curtain has descended across our neighborhoods. 75 million Americans are subject to the rule of communist regimes ruthlessly enforced by efficient capitalist means. Living in an H.O.A. means “вы выезжаете из Американского сектора”. ** you are leaving the American zoneREPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER 
  20. C.T. says: • WebsiteSeptember 8, 2020 at 11:43 pm GMT • 200 Words   @ Tom Sunic:You are a gentleman and gentlemen usually don’t say the whole truth: only children, drunkards and crazy people tell the truth.When I read The Gulag Archipelago and later Kolakowski’s three scholarly volumes debunking the main currents of Marxism, I didn’t connect the dots. Solzhenitsyn himself in his preface says that right thinking is a very slow process. It wasn’t until his second non-fiction book that one begins to connect the dots: especially if one combines that knowledge with the WN material that exposes Lenin and Stalin’s (((willing executioners))).But I don’t like that you tell the truth about Christianity in Homo Americanus and elsewhere while you refrain from criticising KMD for his silly Christian apologetics, as he recently did in his foreword to Giles Corey’s book.See my website. Together with other 60 essays I wrote, an edited version of my recent ‘Kevin MacDonald’s apologetics’ will appear this month in a book.REPLYAGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. THIS COMMENTER 
  21. Jaego says:September 8, 2020 at 11:57 pm GMT • 200 Words   @animalogicUnfortunately, Capitalism created and funded Communism and continues to fund it. That’s not up for debate. You have to explain why they do what they do and why you would identify with people who would fund Communism.As I see it, they did so in order to bring traditional societies under their sway, ones they couldn’t just conquer as they did India. Russia was best dealt with by subversion. Later they used Communism to fight the Fascist and National Socialist regimes that arose to protect Western Culture (Russia and the United States were allies, remember?). Now they’re coming for the middle classes of what’s left of the West.Thus it is One System, Capitalism/Communism, two sides of the same coin with Capitalism as the heads. Likewise, the Elite will remain Capitalist with Communism for the rest of us. Not much of a middle class left as per the Covid hoax and burning and looting.

Author: Alfred E. Neuman

EDITOR ONLY, 74 year old geek, ultra-conservative patriot.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.